Authors are requested to upload their research paper in prescribed format only. (Click here to Download Paper Format). Incorrectly formatted papers are deemed to be rejected by editors.

• All research papers for journals must be submitted using our online submissions system.
• Please make sure that NO grammatical error or spelling mistake is there in the research paper.
• Pictures/Images in the research paper should be as per the format hyperlinked above on our website.
• Please make sure that research paper should be written in Unicode Font (for writing in Sanskrit, Hindi, Odia etc.) or in Times New Roman Font (for writing in English).
• Please use attached transliteration scheme for transliteration of Devenagari in Roman script.
• The publisher/journal does not support any kind of plagiarism or Copyright Infringement. It is considered as a serious breach of ethics and must be avoided to the utmost. Authors are fully responsible for plagiarism and Copyright infringement, if any. However, if any plagiarised article got published by mistake, it will be retracted / deleted from our website and contents.
• By submitting the research paper, the authors warrant that the entire work is original and unpublished; it is submitted only to this Journal and all text, data, figures/tables or other illustrations included in the research paper are completely original and unpublished, and these have not been previously published or submitted elsewhere in any form or media whatsoever.
• All the authors must send ink-signed declaration form via e-mail to editor@cphfs.in, which is notifying that the research paper is fully devoid of plagiarism and copyright infringement.
• Upload the research paper in .doc or .docx format only.

A Double-blind peer review system is followed by the journal to assess the quality of a manuscript before publication. Double-blind peer review means both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. A manuscript is submitted to the external expert editors and/or peer reviewers in the field for assessment of its originality, validity and significance to help the Editors decide whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. Peer reviewers will assess dispassionately whether the writing is comprehensible and scientifically sound and coherent, and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. The Editors/ Editorial Board will reach a decision based on these reports in consultation with members of the Advisory Board (a body of distinguished scholars of the field).

To maintain publication ethics, we strongly believe in strictly following the set of guidelines at four different levels and achieve maximum transparency at our level.

Manuscripts received for peer review will be treated as confidential documents and must not be disclosed to others. Unpublished materials in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s or editor's own research without the express written consent of the author(s).

Authors should expect to receive reviewer-reports in a prompt manner, normally within three weeks. Reviewer’s or editor's misconduct (breach of confidentiality, delay of peer review, plagiarism, or conflicts of interest) will be taken seriously.

1. Role of Authors: The authors should present their original work not previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere, and if the work of others have been used, should be appropriately acknowledged at appropriate places. Plagiarism in all its forms is unacceptable. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the submitted research paper and its onward submission to journal for publication. Authors should present an accurate account of their data. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to the work. Fraudulent or inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may be construed as influencing the data or interpretation. All sources of financial support should be disclosed. If an author discovers a significant error in the published work, the author is obligated to inform the journal editor in order to either correct or retract the paper.

2. Role of Editors: The role of the editors is to evaluate the suitability of submitted manuscripts for the journal, including: (a) the quality of the manuscript, (b) whether it meets the Aims and Scope of the journal, and (c) the originality of the work. The editors must not disclose information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, or other members of the editorial board. Editors will evaluate the merit of manuscripts for their intellectual contents without regard to race, gender, country of origin, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. Editors will ensure the prompt handling of the review process.

3. Role of Reviewers: Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Reviewers should point out relevant publications not cited in the manuscript and point out any similarity with previously published works. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, financial, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors. If a selected reviewer feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript, that reviewer should notify the editors immediately and decline the review.

4. Role of the Publisher: Plagiarism is considered to be a serious breach of scientific ethics and must be avoided utmost. In case of a detected/proven plagiarism, scientific misconduct or fraudulent publication, the publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, will take appropriate action to clarify the situation, publish an erratum, or retract the work in question.

• Best Paper Award (BPA)

We are promoting publication of qualitative research work. Therefore, We are announcing Best Paper Award (BPA) of ₹ 21,000/- annually. The Best Paper Award presented to the Corresponding Author/Sole Author of any Research Paper published in our any Journal having highest citation but not less than 15 within a year from the date of publication of the said paper. The citation is counted from the respective website of journal available on the google scholar. The website link of google scholar of respective journal is available under Board Members heading.

• Paper/Review Article Processing Charges

There is no length restriction for research papers/ review articles. The cost of publication is no longer dependent on the pages in an online version of the journal. All research papers/review articles published in our journals are under open access policy and freely available online. Open access publishing is not without costs. This is made possible by a processing charge that covers the range of publishing services we provide. This includes provision of paper production and hosting, liaison with abstracting and indexing services, and customer services. The processing charge, payable when your manuscript is editorially accepted and before publication, is charged to either you, or your funder, institution or employer.

Authors/Researchers are invited to upload their research paper through online submission form. All the submitted papers will be reviewed as Double-blind peer review process.

Maximum Size Allowed 3 MB Only, if file sizes exceeds 3 MB then please email us on editor@cphfs.in

Please select your required research paper-